TechCodeview

Java-säiepooli edustaa ryhmää työntekijöiden säikeitä, jotka odottavat työtä ja joita käytetään uudelleen monta kertaa.

Jos kyseessä on säiepooli, luodaan kiinteäkokoisten säikeiden ryhmä. Palveluntarjoaja vetää säikeen säikeestä ja määrää sille työn. Työn suorittamisen jälkeen säiettä on jälleen säievarannossa.

base64 javascriptin purku

Thread Pool Methods

newFixedThreadPool(int s): Menetelmä luo lankapoolin, jonka koko on kiinteä s.

newCachedThreadPool(): Menetelmä luo uuden säikeen, joka luo uudet säikeet tarvittaessa, mutta käyttää silti aiemmin luotua säiettä aina, kun ne ovat käytettävissä.

newSingleThreadExecutor(): Menetelmä luo uuden säikeen.

Java Thread Poolin etu

Parempi suorituskyky Se säästää aikaa, koska uutta säiettä ei tarvitse luoda.

Reaaliaikainen käyttö

Sitä käytetään Servletissä ja JSP:ssä, jossa säilö luo säievalikoiman pyynnön käsittelemiseksi.

Esimerkki Java Thread Poolista

Katsotaanpa yksinkertainen esimerkki Java-säievarannosta käyttämällä ExecutorServiceä ja Executorsia.

Tiedosto: WorkerThread.java

 import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService; import java.util.concurrent.Executors; class WorkerThread implements Runnable { private String message; public WorkerThread(String s){ this.message=s; } public void run() { System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+' (Start) message = '+message); processmessage();//call processmessage method that sleeps the thread for 2 seconds System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+' (End)');//prints thread name } private void processmessage() { try { Thread.sleep(2000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } 

Tiedosto: TestThreadPool.java

 public class TestThreadPool { public static void main(String[] args) { ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(5);//creating a pool of 5 threads for (int i = 0; i <10; i++) { runnable worker="new" workerthread('' + i); executor.execute(worker); calling execute method of executorservice } executor.shutdown(); while (!executor.isterminated()) system.out.println('finished all threads'); < pre> <p> <strong>Output:</strong> </p> <pre>pool-1-thread-1 (Start) message = 0 pool-1-thread-2 (Start) message = 1 pool-1-thread-3 (Start) message = 2 pool-1-thread-5 (Start) message = 4 pool-1-thread-4 (Start) message = 3 pool-1-thread-2 (End) pool-1-thread-2 (Start) message = 5 pool-1-thread-1 (End) pool-1-thread-1 (Start) message = 6 pool-1-thread-3 (End) pool-1-thread-3 (Start) message = 7 pool-1-thread-4 (End) pool-1-thread-4 (Start) message = 8 pool-1-thread-5 (End) pool-1-thread-5 (Start) message = 9 pool-1-thread-2 (End) pool-1-thread-1 (End) pool-1-thread-4 (End) pool-1-thread-3 (End) pool-1-thread-5 (End) Finished all threads </pre> download this example <h2>Thread Pool Example: 2</h2> <p>Let&apos;s see another example of the thread pool.</p> <p> <strong>FileName:</strong> ThreadPoolExample.java</p> <pre> // important import statements import java.util.Date; import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService; import java.util.concurrent.Executors; import java.text.SimpleDateFormat; class Tasks implements Runnable { private String taskName; // constructor of the class Tasks public Tasks(String str) { // initializing the field taskName taskName = str; } // Printing the task name and then sleeps for 1 sec // The complete process is getting repeated five times public void run() { try { for (int j = 0; j <= 5; j++) { if (j="=" 0) date dt="new" date(); simpledateformat sdf="new" simpledateformat('hh : mm ss'); prints the initialization time for every task system.out.println('initialization name: '+ taskname + '=" + sdf.format(dt)); } else { Date dt = new Date(); SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat(" hh execution system.out.println('time of is complete.'); } catch(interruptedexception ie) ie.printstacktrace(); public class threadpoolexample maximum number threads in thread pool static final int max_th="3;" main method void main(string argvs[]) creating five new tasks runnable rb1="new" tasks('task 1'); rb2="new" 2'); rb3="new" 3'); rb4="new" 4'); rb5="new" 5'); a with size fixed executorservice pl="Executors.newFixedThreadPool(MAX_TH);" passes objects to execute (step 3) pl.execute(rb1); pl.execute(rb2); pl.execute(rb3); pl.execute(rb4); pl.execute(rb5); shutdown pl.shutdown(); < pre> <p> <strong>Output:</strong> </p> <pre> Initialization time for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 02 Initialization time for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 02 Initialization time for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 02 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 08 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 08 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 08 task 2 is complete. Initialization time for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 09 task 1 is complete. Initialization time for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 09 task 3 is complete. Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 10 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 10 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 11 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 11 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 12 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 12 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 13 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 13 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 14 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 14 task 4 is complete. task 5 is complete. </pre> <p> <strong>Explanation:</strong> It is evident by looking at the output of the program that tasks 4 and 5 are executed only when the thread has an idle thread. Until then, the extra tasks are put in the queue.</p> <p>The takeaway from the above example is when one wants to execute 50 tasks but is not willing to create 50 threads. In such a case, one can create a pool of 10 threads. Thus, 10 out of 50 tasks are assigned, and the rest are put in the queue. Whenever any thread out of 10 threads becomes idle, it picks up the 11<sup>th </sup>task. The other pending tasks are treated the same way.</p> <h2>Risks involved in Thread Pools</h2> <p>The following are the risk involved in the thread pools.</p> <p> <strong>Deadlock:</strong> It is a known fact that deadlock can come in any program that involves multithreading, and a thread pool introduces another scenario of deadlock. Consider a scenario where all the threads that are executing are waiting for the results from the threads that are blocked and waiting in the queue because of the non-availability of threads for the execution.</p> <p> <strong>Thread Leakage:</strong> Leakage of threads occurs when a thread is being removed from the pool to execute a task but is not returning to it after the completion of the task. For example, when a thread throws the exception and the pool class is not able to catch this exception, then the thread exits and reduces the thread pool size by 1. If the same thing repeats a number of times, then there are fair chances that the pool will become empty, and hence, there are no threads available in the pool for executing other requests.</p> <p> <strong>Resource Thrashing:</strong> A lot of time is wasted in context switching among threads when the size of the thread pool is very large. Whenever there are more threads than the optimal number may cause the starvation problem, and it leads to resource thrashing.</p> <h2>Points to Remember</h2> <p>Do not queue the tasks that are concurrently waiting for the results obtained from the other tasks. It may lead to a deadlock situation, as explained above.</p> <p>Care must be taken whenever threads are used for the operation that is long-lived. It may result in the waiting of thread forever and will finally lead to the leakage of the resource.</p> <p>In the end, the thread pool has to be ended explicitly. If it does not happen, then the program continues to execute, and it never ends. Invoke the shutdown() method on the thread pool to terminate the executor. Note that if someone tries to send another task to the executor after shutdown, it will throw a RejectedExecutionException.</p> <p>One needs to understand the tasks to effectively tune the thread pool. If the given tasks are contrasting, then one should look for pools for executing different varieties of tasks so that one can properly tune them.</p> <p>To reduce the probability of running JVM out of memory, one can control the maximum threads that can run in JVM. The thread pool cannot create new threads after it has reached the maximum limit.</p> <p>A thread pool can use the same used thread if the thread has finished its execution. Thus, the time and resources used for the creation of a new thread are saved.</p> <h2>Tuning the Thread Pool</h2> <p>The accurate size of a thread pool is decided by the number of available processors and the type of tasks the threads have to execute. If a system has the P processors that have only got the computation type processes, then the maximum size of the thread pool of P or P + 1 achieves the maximum efficiency. However, the tasks may have to wait for I/O, and in such a scenario, one has to take into consideration the ratio of the waiting time (W) and the service time (S) for the request; resulting in the maximum size of the pool P * (1 + W / S) for the maximum efficiency.</p> <h2>Conclusion</h2> <p>A thread pool is a very handy tool for organizing applications, especially on the server-side. Concept-wise, a thread pool is very easy to comprehend. However, one may have to look at a lot of issues when dealing with a thread pool. It is because the thread pool comes with some risks involved it (risks are discussed above).</p> <hr></=></pre></10;>

Esimerkki: 2

Katsotaanpa toinen esimerkki säikeestä.

kuinka avata json-tiedosto

Tiedoston nimi: ThreadPoolExample.java

 // important import statements import java.util.Date; import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService; import java.util.concurrent.Executors; import java.text.SimpleDateFormat; class Tasks implements Runnable { private String taskName; // constructor of the class Tasks public Tasks(String str) { // initializing the field taskName taskName = str; } // Printing the task name and then sleeps for 1 sec // The complete process is getting repeated five times public void run() { try { for (int j = 0; j <= 5; j++) { if (j="=" 0) date dt="new" date(); simpledateformat sdf="new" simpledateformat(\'hh : mm ss\'); prints the initialization time for every task system.out.println(\'initialization name: \'+ taskname + \'=" + sdf.format(dt)); } else { Date dt = new Date(); SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat(" hh execution system.out.println(\'time of is complete.\'); } catch(interruptedexception ie) ie.printstacktrace(); public class threadpoolexample maximum number threads in thread pool static final int max_th="3;" main method void main(string argvs[]) creating five new tasks runnable rb1="new" tasks(\'task 1\'); rb2="new" 2\'); rb3="new" 3\'); rb4="new" 4\'); rb5="new" 5\'); a with size fixed executorservice pl="Executors.newFixedThreadPool(MAX_TH);" passes objects to execute (step 3) pl.execute(rb1); pl.execute(rb2); pl.execute(rb3); pl.execute(rb4); pl.execute(rb5); shutdown pl.shutdown(); < pre> <p> <strong>Output:</strong> </p> <pre> Initialization time for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 02 Initialization time for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 02 Initialization time for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 02 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 08 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 08 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 08 task 2 is complete. Initialization time for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 09 task 1 is complete. Initialization time for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 09 task 3 is complete. Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 10 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 10 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 11 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 11 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 12 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 12 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 13 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 13 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 14 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 14 task 4 is complete. task 5 is complete. </pre> <p> <strong>Explanation:</strong> It is evident by looking at the output of the program that tasks 4 and 5 are executed only when the thread has an idle thread. Until then, the extra tasks are put in the queue.</p> <p>The takeaway from the above example is when one wants to execute 50 tasks but is not willing to create 50 threads. In such a case, one can create a pool of 10 threads. Thus, 10 out of 50 tasks are assigned, and the rest are put in the queue. Whenever any thread out of 10 threads becomes idle, it picks up the 11<sup>th </sup>task. The other pending tasks are treated the same way.</p> <h2>Risks involved in Thread Pools</h2> <p>The following are the risk involved in the thread pools.</p> <p> <strong>Deadlock:</strong> It is a known fact that deadlock can come in any program that involves multithreading, and a thread pool introduces another scenario of deadlock. Consider a scenario where all the threads that are executing are waiting for the results from the threads that are blocked and waiting in the queue because of the non-availability of threads for the execution.</p> <p> <strong>Thread Leakage:</strong> Leakage of threads occurs when a thread is being removed from the pool to execute a task but is not returning to it after the completion of the task. For example, when a thread throws the exception and the pool class is not able to catch this exception, then the thread exits and reduces the thread pool size by 1. If the same thing repeats a number of times, then there are fair chances that the pool will become empty, and hence, there are no threads available in the pool for executing other requests.</p> <p> <strong>Resource Thrashing:</strong> A lot of time is wasted in context switching among threads when the size of the thread pool is very large. Whenever there are more threads than the optimal number may cause the starvation problem, and it leads to resource thrashing.</p> <h2>Points to Remember</h2> <p>Do not queue the tasks that are concurrently waiting for the results obtained from the other tasks. It may lead to a deadlock situation, as explained above.</p> <p>Care must be taken whenever threads are used for the operation that is long-lived. It may result in the waiting of thread forever and will finally lead to the leakage of the resource.</p> <p>In the end, the thread pool has to be ended explicitly. If it does not happen, then the program continues to execute, and it never ends. Invoke the shutdown() method on the thread pool to terminate the executor. Note that if someone tries to send another task to the executor after shutdown, it will throw a RejectedExecutionException.</p> <p>One needs to understand the tasks to effectively tune the thread pool. If the given tasks are contrasting, then one should look for pools for executing different varieties of tasks so that one can properly tune them.</p> <p>To reduce the probability of running JVM out of memory, one can control the maximum threads that can run in JVM. The thread pool cannot create new threads after it has reached the maximum limit.</p> <p>A thread pool can use the same used thread if the thread has finished its execution. Thus, the time and resources used for the creation of a new thread are saved.</p> <h2>Tuning the Thread Pool</h2> <p>The accurate size of a thread pool is decided by the number of available processors and the type of tasks the threads have to execute. If a system has the P processors that have only got the computation type processes, then the maximum size of the thread pool of P or P + 1 achieves the maximum efficiency. However, the tasks may have to wait for I/O, and in such a scenario, one has to take into consideration the ratio of the waiting time (W) and the service time (S) for the request; resulting in the maximum size of the pool P * (1 + W / S) for the maximum efficiency.</p> <h2>Conclusion</h2> <p>A thread pool is a very handy tool for organizing applications, especially on the server-side. Concept-wise, a thread pool is very easy to comprehend. However, one may have to look at a lot of issues when dealing with a thread pool. It is because the thread pool comes with some risks involved it (risks are discussed above).</p> <hr></=>

Selitys: Ohjelman tulosteesta on selvää, että tehtävät 4 ja 5 suoritetaan vain, kun säikeellä on vapaa säie. Siihen asti ylimääräiset tehtävät laitetaan jonoon.

Yllä oleva esimerkki on, kun halutaan suorittaa 50 tehtävää, mutta ei haluta luoda 50 säiettä. Tällaisessa tapauksessa voidaan luoda 10 säikeen pooli. Siten 10 tehtävästä 50:stä jaetaan ja loput laitetaan jonoon. Aina kun mikä tahansa lanka 10:stä jää käyttämättömäksi, se poimii 11:stä^thtehtävä. Muita vireillä olevia tehtäviä käsitellään samalla tavalla.

Keikkapooleihin liittyvät riskit

Seuraavat ovat lankapooleihin liittyvät riskit.

umpikuja: On tunnettu tosiasia, että umpikuja voi tulla missä tahansa ohjelmassa, joka sisältää monisäikeen, ja säiepooli esittelee toisen umpikujatilanteen. Harkitse skenaariota, jossa kaikki suoritettavat säikeet odottavat tuloksia estetyistä säikeistä ja odottavat jonossa, koska säikeitä ei ole käytettävissä suoritusta varten.

Langan vuoto: Säikeiden vuotaminen tapahtuu, kun säiettä poistetaan ryhmästä tehtävän suorittamiseksi, mutta se ei palaa siihen tehtävän suorittamisen jälkeen. Esimerkiksi, kun säie heittää poikkeuksen ja pooliluokka ei pysty saamaan tätä poikkeusta kiinni, säie poistuu ja pienentää säieryhmän kokoa yhdellä. Jos sama toistuu useita kertoja, on olemassa kohtuulliset mahdollisuudet, että poolista tulee tyhjä, joten poolissa ei ole saatavilla säikeitä muiden pyyntöjen suorittamista varten.

Resurssien puskiminen: Paljon aikaa menee hukkaan säikeiden väliseen kontekstin vaihtamiseen, kun säietaltaan koko on erittäin suuri. Aina, kun lankoja on enemmän kuin optimaalinen määrä, voi aiheuttaa nälänhätäongelman, ja se johtaa resurssien puskimiseen.

Muistettavat kohdat

Älä aseta jonoon tehtäviä, jotka odottavat samanaikaisesti muiden tehtävien tuloksia. Se voi johtaa lukkiutumiseen, kuten edellä selitettiin.

Varovaisuutta on noudatettava aina, kun lankoja käytetään pitkäikäiseen toimintaan. Se voi johtaa säikeen ikuiseen odottamiseen ja lopulta johtaa resurssien vuotamiseen.

Loppujen lopuksi lankavarasto on lopetettava nimenomaisesti. Jos näin ei tapahdu, ohjelman suorittaminen jatkuu, eikä se lopu koskaan. Kutsu shutdown()-metodi säievarastoon lopettaaksesi suorittajan. Huomaa, että jos joku yrittää lähettää toisen tehtävän suorittajalle sammutuksen jälkeen, se antaa RejectedExecutionException-ilmoituksen.

On ymmärrettävä tehtävät säikeen tehokkaan virittämiseksi. Jos annetut tehtävät ovat ristiriitaisia, kannattaa etsiä pooleja erilaisten tehtävien suorittamiseen, jotta niitä voidaan virittää oikein.

muuntaminen tupla-javaksi

Voit vähentää JVM:n muistin loppumisen todennäköisyyttä hallitsemalla JVM:ssä suoritettavien säikeiden enimmäismäärää. Säievarasto ei voi luoda uusia säikeitä sen jälkeen, kun se on saavuttanut enimmäisrajan.

Säievarasto voi käyttää samaa käytettyä säiettä, jos säie on suorittanut loppuun. Näin uuden säikeen luomiseen käytetty aika ja resurssit säästyy.

Ketjun viritys

Säikeryhmän tarkka koko määräytyy käytettävissä olevien prosessorien lukumäärän ja säikeiden suoritettavien tehtävien tyypin mukaan. Jos järjestelmässä on P-prosessorit, jotka ovat saaneet vain laskentatyyppiset prosessit, niin säiepoolin P tai P + 1 maksimikoko saavuttaa suurimman hyötysuhteen. Tehtävät voivat kuitenkin joutua odottamaan I/O:ta, ja tällaisessa skenaariossa on otettava huomioon pyynnön odotusajan (W) ja palveluajan (S) suhde; tuloksena on altaan maksimikoko P * (1 + W / S) maksimaalisen tehokkuuden saavuttamiseksi.

Johtopäätös

Säiepooli on erittäin kätevä työkalu sovellusten järjestämiseen, erityisesti palvelinpuolella. Käsitteellisesti lankapooli on erittäin helppo ymmärtää. Saattaa kuitenkin joutua tarkastelemaan monia asioita käsiteltäessä säiepoolia. Se johtuu siitä, että lankapooliin liittyy joitain riskejä (riskeistä on keskusteltu edellä).